Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Franklin's avatar

So the conclusion seems to be that smaller districts more responsive but increasing the number of districts would require increasing the number of representatives, which can be harder in larger countries. What would happen if we were to assign seats based on the total percentile average for each district (for example if there were 6 districts with 100 people each and the blues won three of them with 60 votes and lost the other three with 40 votes which would give them 50 seats in an 100 seat senate?)

Expand full comment
sjk's avatar

You might want to take a look at STV (Single Transferable Vote), which is a way of getting closer to proportional representation without having a party list system. It's a form of Ranked Choice Voting that elects multiple winners in a single election.

The more representatives per district, the closer to proportional representation you can get, but you can still have geographical districts, which is a good thing because there are regional concerns and interests in politics. So there is a tradeoff between locality of representation and granularity of proportional representation. Multiple representatives per district, elected with a proportional system such as STV, makes gerrymandering very difficult if not impossible.

Approval voting is problematic because it violates one-person-one-vote, it violates later-no-harm, and may also be subject to manipulation by organized groups.

Expand full comment
33 more comments...

No posts